<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mellotron Sounds &#187; Kate Winslet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mellotronsounds.com/index.php/tag/kate-winslet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mellotronsounds.com</link>
	<description>Floating Notes and Flickering Screens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 23:15:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Review: The Reader</title>
		<link>http://mellotronsounds.com/index.php/2009/08/18/review-the-reader/</link>
		<comments>http://mellotronsounds.com/index.php/2009/08/18/review-the-reader/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Winslet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Reader]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrestlingleak.com/index.php/2009/08/18/review-the-reader/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The Reader
Director: Stephen Daldry
Released: January 9, 2009
**** 4/5
What I probably like best about The Reader is just how much of an anti-Holocaust &#8220;Holocaust movie&#8221; it is. Most concerned with the generation that came after and had to live in the shadow of Nazi Germany, it tackles not the atrocity of the camps (which, let&#8217;s face [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://filmbender.typepad.com/.a/6a00e554e7984888330111683973a9970c-800wi" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer;" src="http://filmbender.typepad.com/.a/6a00e554e7984888330111683973a9970c-800wi" border="0" alt="" width="565" height="341" /></a><br />
<span style="font-style: italic;">The Reader</span><br />
Director: Stephen Daldry<br />
Released: January 9, 2009<br />
**** 4/5</p>
<p>What I probably like best about <span style="font-style: italic;">The Reader</span> is just how much of an anti-Holocaust &#8220;Holocaust movie&#8221; it is. Most concerned with the generation that came after and had to live in the shadow of Nazi Germany, it tackles not the atrocity of the camps (which, let&#8217;s face it, has been done, and done) but rather everything that surrounded them, the group mentality and total incomprehensibility of them. Its strength, though&#8211;its enormous scope&#8211;actually also serves as its weakness. Strings tangle, come together then release, creating a final product that feels as brilliant as it does incomplete.</p>
<p>Incredibly shot and <span style="font-style: italic;">so </span>well acted, what the film explores is this idea of greyness, our inability but constant attempt to understand the past and whether there is, in fact, anything to learn from it in the first place. Nothing is easy or typical, and that&#8217;s great. But where it seems like Daldry goes soft is by giving us an ending rather than an open question, an almost tidy, if not entirely hopeful, resolution. It&#8217;s the idea of literacy, that Winslet&#8217;s character Hannah <span style="font-style: italic;">could </span>change, <span style="font-style: italic;">could </span>learn something, her money going to Jewish literacy foundations after she dies, creating something good, however small, out of so much bad. It&#8217;s not absolution, as one survivor reminds us, but don&#8217;t be fooled, it kind of is.</p>
<p>But I honestly don&#8217;t believe that <span style="font-style: italic;">The Reader</span> or Stephen Daldry is in the business of absolving Nazis, only asking questions, commenting on how ridiculously complicated life is. If you love someone and they do something awful, what happens to the love? Can good things ever come from bad ones, or does it only matter that we never stop looking for them? And the biggest and most impossible question of all, of course: how can something like this happen?</p>
<p>I admit, I wish Hannah&#8217;s crimes were shown to us. To only reference them seems cheap and easy. But if they were the movie&#8217;s major theme might be lost. We would be incapable of having any kind of sympathy for her. The complication would be gone, grey to black, the same as when Michael gets his first letter back after weeks of sending tapes to her in jail. He does it for himself, because he still loves her, her memory and abstraction. But when she responds, his illusions are broken. She becomes real. And he stops sending.</p>
<p>What do we do with all of this confusion and how does it define us? That, I think, is the major question of the film. But at its heart there&#8217;s a longing for the simplicity of the very first sentence of Hannah&#8217;s favorite book, <span style="font-style: italic;">The Lady with the Little Dog</span>. There are no cruel or grey undertones there, nothing tragic or doomed. There&#8217;s only an observation of a woman, one that could be happy or hopeful, one that could be anyone:  &#8220;It was said that a new face had appeared on the promenade: a lady with a little dog.&#8221;</p>
<p>What do you think? There&#8217;s so much going on here, you really can&#8217;t even say the movie is &#8220;about&#8221; any one thing. And maybe that&#8217;s why, despite my complaints, I like it so much. But I want to hear another take. I still haven&#8217;t ruled out the possibility that Daldry just let Hannah off the hook and distracted us with sentimentality. Am I crazy? This movie has me running in circles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mellotronsounds.com/index.php/2009/08/18/review-the-reader/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Remember When TV Used to be the Poor Man&#8217;s Cinema?</title>
		<link>http://mellotronsounds.com/index.php/2009/08/15/remember-when-tv-used-to-be-the-poor-mans-cinema/</link>
		<comments>http://mellotronsounds.com/index.php/2009/08/15/remember-when-tv-used-to-be-the-poor-mans-cinema/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 20:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Winslet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrestlingleak.com/index.php/2009/08/15/remember-when-tv-used-to-be-the-poor-mans-cinema/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not anymore. Cheap TV died with the laugh track and now not only are seriously heavy shows (Six Feet Under, The Wire) with seriously heavy scopes (Band of Brothers, The Pacific) becoming the new point to aspire to, but they&#8217;re also beginning to draw some serious actors (Paul Giamati, Kate Winslet).
Wait, Kate Winslet?!
Oh yeah! Variety [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://i54.photobucket.com/albums/g84/harobed216/Actresses/Kate%20Winslet/kate-winslet-336226.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer; width: 289px; height: 386px;" src="http://i54.photobucket.com/albums/g84/harobed216/Actresses/Kate%20Winslet/kate-winslet-336226.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a>Not anymore. Cheap TV died with the laugh track and now not only are seriously heavy shows (<span style="font-style: italic;">Six Feet Under, The Wire</span>) with seriously heavy scopes (<span style="font-style: italic;">Band of Brothers, The Pacific</span>) becoming the new point to aspire to, but they&#8217;re also beginning to draw some serious actors (Paul Giamati, Kate Winslet).</p>
<p>Wait, Kate Winslet?!</p>
<p>Oh yeah! <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118007276.html?categoryid=14&amp;cs=1&amp;nid=2562">Variety </a>reports that Winslet has signed on for a mini-series adaptation of James M. Cain&#8217;s novel <span style="font-style: italic;">Mildred Pierce</span>, directed by another established film artist, Tod Haynes (<span style="font-style: italic;">I&#8217;m Not There, Far from Heaven</span>).</p>
<p>The show will be set in 1930’s LA and Winslet will play the part of a middle-class, single mother attempting to maintain her and her family’s social position during the Great Depression. No network has picked up the &#8217;series yet but rumor has that HBO might (what a surprise). Even if they don&#8217;t, though, how can this possibly be bad?</p>
<p>Cain&#8217;s story was already adapted into a film starring Joan Crawford (for which she won an Oscar, her only) in 1945. And even though I can&#8217;t say I&#8217;ve either read the book or seen Crawford&#8217;s movie, the female lead must be something to have won her the award. If there&#8217;s anyone who can stand in the shoes of an Oscar winner, though, maybe even top her, it&#8217;s Kate Winslet. I absolutely can&#8217;t wait for this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mellotronsounds.com/index.php/2009/08/15/remember-when-tv-used-to-be-the-poor-mans-cinema/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

